As a strategic consultant who has guided multinational corporations through the complexities of global expansion for over two decades, I have consistently observed a fundamental truth: a standardized, one-size-fits-all approach to public relations is not just a bad idea; in today’s hyper-connected yet culturally fragmented world, it’s a major liability.
The decision to enter a new international market is a critical turning point that goes far beyond logistics and finance. It is an entry into a new society, a new culture, and a new web of relationships. It is within this intricate human landscape that public relations (PR) finds its highest strategic purpose.
My analysis begins by framing PR not as a simple marketing function, but as a core component of executive management. A classic definition I often refer to holds that public relations is “the art and social science of analysing trends, predicting their consequences, counselling organisations’ leaders and implementing planned programmes of actions, which will serve both the interests of the organisation and the publics.” This definition is more critical now than ever.
For a global company, effective PR is the primary way to create and maintain goodwill and mutual understanding with all the different groups it interacts with—from customers and employees to investors and government bodies. It is the profession dedicated to managing the delicate connections that grant a foreign entity its social license to operate.
When operating internationally, PR is essential in helping a brand be understood and accepted across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. Its core functions are to manage reputation, build the brand, navigate crises, and engage people in a meaningful dialogue.
In essence, a company’s reputation can be its single greatest asset in a competitive market, the very thing that provides a competitive edge. My experience confirms that organizations that successfully integrate PR into their international marketing and business development are the ones that cultivate strong relationships, build sustainable brand equity, and can adeptly manage the complexities of varied markets.
This, in turn, is what leads to sustainable development and long-term success in international business.
From Awareness to Acceptance: The Role of PR in the Market Entry Funnel
The strategic value of public relations becomes crystal clear when you look at the distinct phases of entering a new market. My work with leadership teams has shown that viewing this process as a simple, linear path is a mistake.
It is, rather, a continuous cycle of building, reinforcing, and defending the brand’s position and reputation. PR is the engine that drives this cycle.
Pre-Entry Intelligence & Groundwork
The work of PR begins long before a single product is sold or an office is opened. This initial phase is one of deep intelligence gathering and strategic groundwork, where PR functions as a critical market-sensing tool.
A company’s decision to enter a new market must be based on a thorough assessment of marketing and cultural aspects, legal and political conditions, and the competitive landscape. Standard due diligence often treats these as separate analytical streams. However, a sophisticated PR function serves to integrate them.
The process of engaging with local stakeholders and understanding cultural nuances provides the essential human data that quantitative market research often misses.
Therefore, strategic PR must be viewed as a vital market intelligence and de-risking function. By embedding PR professionals—preferably local experts—into the initial market assessment team, a company can identify potential “deal-breaker” cultural or political issues at the earliest stage. This proactive approach can prevent costly missteps and high-profile failures down the line.
This phase also involves navigating the labyrinth of local laws, regulations, and permits, a process where government relations—a core PR competency—is indispensable for ensuring a smooth entry.
Crafting the Initial Narrative
Once the strategic groundwork has been laid, PR takes the lead in crafting the initial communication efforts. This is a critical stage where the brand’s first impression is formed. It is not about a massive advertising blitz; rather, it is about methodically building brand recognition and creating a positive, credible image within the local context.
The goal is to establish trust and familiarity with the brand among the local audience before a major marketing push. This involves building strong relationships with key local media, influencers, and community leaders who can act as credible third-party validators for the brand’s message.
The narrative must be tailored, resonating with local sensibilities and avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach that signals a lack of cultural understanding.
Sustaining Reputation & Building Loyalty
After a successful market entry, the role of PR evolves from introduction to stewardship. This is a long-term commitment to safeguarding and enhancing the brand’s reputation.
It involves consistently delivering the right message, meeting customer expectations, and managing the brand’s image and credibility through ongoing engagement. A crucial component of this phase is crisis management. In any foreign market, and particularly in complex ones, challenges will arise.
An effective PR strategy ensures that the brand’s reputation remains intact even in difficult situations, leveraging the reservoir of trust built during the earlier phases to navigate turbulence.
Ultimately, it is this sustained, authentic engagement that transforms initial customer interest into lasting brand loyalty, which is the bedrock of sustained success.
Part II: Deconstructing the Israeli Market: A Landscape of Paradoxes
To advise any global company on entering the Israeli market, I must first paint a picture of its defining characteristic: paradox. Israel is a nation where a world-leading, innovation-driven internal reality coexists with an intensely complex and often fraught external perception. This paradox is not a peripheral detail; it is the central strategic challenge that any incoming brand’s public relations strategy must be designed to navigate. Understanding and addressing this duality is the key to unlocking the market’s immense potential while mitigating its unique risks.
The “Start-Up Nation” Ecosystem: An Engine of Global Innovation
The first side of the paradox is Israel’s status as a global economic and technological powerhouse.
Despite its small size and geopolitical challenges, the Israeli economy is a highly developed and attractive market. Its foundation is a potent combination of a highly educated and motivated workforce, deep-seated cooperation between academia and private industry, and one of the world’s most robust venture capital ecosystems.
According to the IMD, Israel has the highest availability of engineers and scientists worldwide and ranks number one in the OECD for expenditure on R&D.
This environment has created the phenomenon widely known as the “Start-Up Nation,” a hyper-innovative culture that produces the most substantial number of startups per capita in the world.
Israel is a global leader in high-technology sectors such as ICT, biotechnology, medical devices, and cybersecurity. This is not merely a domestic success story; it is a critical node in the global innovation network.
This is evidenced by the presence of over 500 R&D centers established by multinational corporations, many of them Fortune 500 companies like Intel, Microsoft, Apple, Google, IBM, and Facebook, who chose Israel for their first overseas R&D facilities.
For global companies, particularly in the B2B and technology service sectors, this presents a dual opportunity. Israel is not just a market to sell to; it is an ecosystem to integrate with.
The opportunities for strategic partnerships, talent acquisition, and technological co-development are immense. A successful PR strategy, therefore, must communicate not just a value proposition to Israeli customers, but also a commitment to being a constructive participant in this world-class innovation ecosystem.
The “Brand Israel” Dilemma: Navigating Geopolitical Headwinds and Shifting Global Perceptions
The other side of the paradox is the severe challenge facing Israel’s national brand on the world stage. While the internal engine of innovation hums, the country’s external reputation is under significant strain.
My analysis of recent global sentiment data reveals a stark and troubling picture that no global company can afford to ignore. According to the 2024 Nation Brands Index (NBI), a comprehensive survey of over 40,000 respondents across 70 countries, Israel was ranked last among 50 nations, with a growing global perception of it as a “destabilizing force”.
This is not a vague sentiment; the NBI data points to specific and alarming trends. It reveals a growing aversion to products labeled “Made in Israel,” suggesting a de facto consumer boycott that poses a serious risk to international business operations.
There is also a profound disconnect between Israel’s self-perception as the “Start-Up Nation” and its global image; European respondents, for instance, ranked Israel lower in technological advancement than the United Arab Emirates.
This negative perception is particularly acute among younger demographics, with Generation Z expressing a significant aversion toward Israel across nearly every parameter of the index. This indicates a long-term reputational challenge that is likely to intensify.
This situation creates a unique and potent risk for any global brand operating in the country. When a company enters a new market, it implicitly associates itself with that nation’s brand.
In most cases, this association is neutral or beneficial. In the current climate, however, a global brand entering Israel inherits a national brand that is, in many parts of the world, viewed through a lens of conflict and controversy.
This creates a “reputational inheritance” risk, where the global brand’s own reputation can be damaged by association, irrespective of its own conduct. The company can become a proxy target for activism and boycotts directed at the state itself.
Consequently, my advice is that a public relations strategy for Israel must be fundamentally dual-pronged. The first prong must be internally focused, designed to build trust, relevance, and a strong local identity within the Israeli market.
The second prong must be externally focused, designed to proactively manage the narrative of why the company is operating in Israel to its global stakeholders—investors, employees, and customers in other regions.
This external narrative cannot ignore the geopolitical context. It must be carefully crafted, perhaps by emphasizing the company’s role in the apolitical global tech ecosystem, its commitment to its diverse local workforce, or its engagement in cross-community initiatives that promote peace and shared prosperity.
A failure to develop and deploy this external narrative can leave a brand dangerously exposed to global reputational damage, a lesson learned the hard way by several major corporations.
Building Relationships in a High-Context, Low-Formality Culture
To succeed in Israel, a global brand must fundamentally re-calibrate its approach to communication and relationship-building. My analysis of the Israeli cultural and business landscape reveals a society where traditional, hierarchical, and indirect methods of engagement are destined to fail.
The market is defined by a unique blend of high-context relationships and low-formality communication. Success is contingent on a brand’s ability to master this dynamic, demonstrating authenticity, directness, and a genuine commitment to personal connection.
Speaking “Dugri”: The Art of Direct Communication and Relationship Building
The cornerstone of Israeli interaction, both in business and socially, is the concept of “dugri”—speaking directly or straight to the point. My research and field experience show that Israeli communication is characterized by its honesty, efficiency, and a bluntness that can be jarring to those from more indirect cultures. This is not intended to be aggressive; rather, it is a cultural preference for clarity and time-saving, where ambiguity is often seen as confusing or evasive.
This directness is interwoven with a deep-seated informality.
Hierarchies, particularly in the dominant tech sector, are relatively flat. It is common to use first names with superiors, and employees at all levels feel empowered to voice opinions and challenge ideas. In fact, lively discussion and debate are not viewed as insubordination but as a positive sign of engagement and critical thinking.
Crucially, global executives must understand that this direct communication style does not negate the importance of relationships. On the contrary, Israel is a high-context, relationship-driven society.
While business conversations may get to the point quickly, the willingness to do business in the first place is often predicated on personal connection and trust.
I always advise clients to invest significant time in building rapport. Informal conversations, sharing a coffee, and getting to know partners on a personal level are not pleasantries; they are essential parts of the business process. Deals are done between people, not just between companies.
The Psychology of the Israeli Shopper: Demanding, Tech-Savvy, and Authentic
The Israeli consumer is a unique blend of Middle Eastern and European sensibilities, operating in a market that occupies a middle ground between the production-oriented cultures of Europe and the consumerist orientation of settler societies like the United States. My analysis of their behavior reveals several key traits that global brands must understand.
First, Israeli consumers are sophisticated and demanding.
They are often early adopters of new technologies and fashion trends, highly exposed to the outside world through travel and the internet, and expect high levels of quality and service. They are not passive recipients of marketing; they are active, critical participants in the marketplace.
Second, they are exceptionally tech-savvy. Israel has one of the highest smartphone penetration rates globally, which means a mobile-first strategy is not an option—it is a baseline requirement.
Digital fluency is high, and consumers expect seamless online experiences, from e-commerce to customer service.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, they have a profound appreciation for authenticity and transparency. Israeli consumers are quick to detect and reject inauthentic brand messaging and corporate jargon.
They value direct, honest communication from brands, mirroring their own interpersonal style. Brands that demonstrate clear values—such as social responsibility, sustainability, and a genuine customer focus—are more likely to build a strong connection with this audience.
The Digital Town Square: Media Consumption in a Hyper-Connected Society
The Israeli media landscape is both highly innovative and highly concentrated, with a few major players like Keshet Media Group and Reshet 13 holding significant influence in traditional media.
However, the most significant trend is the rapid and decisive shift to a digital-first model of content consumption, driven by high internet and mobile penetration rates.
For a global brand, the most important channels to master are digital and social. The dominant platforms each serve a distinct purpose:
-
WhatsApp:
Ubiquitous for both personal and business communication, it is the primary channel for direct and group messaging.
-
Facebook:
Remains a stronghold, particularly among older demographics, making it crucial for broad-reach campaigns.
-
Instagram & TikTok:
These are the platforms of choice for younger Israelis, especially for lifestyle, commerce, and short-form video content, which is rapidly growing in popularity across all channels.
-
LinkedIn:
Essential for B2B marketing, professional networking, and reaching decision-makers in the “Start-Up Nation” ecosystem.
A successful PR and marketing strategy must be meticulously localized.
This includes adapting to the Israeli work week (Sunday to Thursday), being mindful of the numerous Jewish holidays during which business activity ceases, and developing multilingual content. While Hebrew is dominant, using English can significantly expand reach, especially in the tech and business communities.
The combination of a direct, debate-oriented culture and the prevalence of highly interactive social media platforms creates a unique dynamic. Israeli consumers do not hesitate to use a brand’s social media pages as a public forum to ask tough questions, voice strong opinions, and engage in heated debate.
For a global brand, this presents both a risk and an opportunity. A passive social media strategy, where a central office posts generic content without engaging with the responses, will be perceived as arrogant or evasive and will quickly erode trust.
Conversely, a proactive strategy that embraces this dynamic—with empowered local community managers who can respond quickly, directly, and authentically—can build a fiercely loyal community that appreciates the brand’s willingness to engage in the conversation.
The Currency of Trust: The Ultimate Barrier and Gateway
In my extensive experience advising firms on market entry, I have found that while trust is a valuable asset in any market, in Israel it functions as the foundational currency of business.
For a global company, particularly one in the services sector, establishing and maintaining trust is not a “soft” objective to be delegated to the marketing department; it is the primary strategic imperative that will ultimately determine success or failure.
In a region characterized by geopolitical uncertainty, consumers and business partners alike gravitate toward relationships and brands that offer a sense of reliability and integrity.
Building Brand Equity in a Market with a High “Certainty” Need
To understand the Israeli consumer, one must appreciate the psychological context. Living in a region of perpetual geopolitical flux creates a strong need for certainty and control in the areas of life where it’s possible.
While Israelis may be comfortable with ambiguity in a debate, when it comes to commercial transactions and brand relationships, they seek clarity and reliability.
This psychological need elevates the importance of trust to a paramount level. Consumer trust becomes the key foundation for a brand’s sustainability, creating a powerful emotional connection and the confident expectation that the brand will consistently deliver on its promises. This is especially true in the services sector—be it finance, consulting, telecommunications, or B2B technology—where the “product” is often intangible. In these industries, the relationship is the product, and that relationship is built entirely on a bedrock of trust.
A study of the Israeli banking system, for example, found that factors like transparency and integrity were critical in building customer trust.
Global data on consumer loyalty reinforces this point. While getting good value for the price is a top reason for brand loyalty, bad experiences—with either the product or customer service—are the overwhelming drivers for customers to switch brands.
In fact, 55% of consumers report they would stop buying from a company they liked after several bad experiences, and a notable 8% would leave after just one. In the demanding Israeli market, that tolerance is likely even lower.
Therefore, a consistent, high-quality, and reliable customer experience is not just a goal; it is a critical component of risk management and the primary mechanism for building the trust that underpins brand equity.
The Politicized Consumer: Navigating Boycotts and Brand Nationalism
The most acute and complex challenge to building trust in the Israeli market stems from the deeply politicized nature of consumption in the region. Global brands operating in Israel are not just entering a new economy; they are stepping onto a geopolitical stage where their actions, and even their mere presence, are scrutinized through a political lens.
Recent data from the Edelman Trust Barometer reveals that this is a global trend, with 6 in 10 consumers now buying or boycotting brands to express their political views. However, this trend has spiked dramatically in the Middle East, directly attributable to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
A staggering 55% of respondents in key regional markets like Saudi Arabia and the UAE report boycotting brands that support a side in the conflict. This has had a tangible and severe impact on major global brands.
Starbucks, for example, lost an estimated $11 billion in market value following boycotts, and McDonald’s experienced significant sales declines in Middle Eastern markets due to the perception that its Israeli franchise was supporting the Israeli military.
My analysis of these crises reveals a critical lesson: attempting to maintain a position of corporate “neutrality” is often a failing strategy. In a highly polarized environment, neutrality is frequently interpreted by activists on all sides as a tacit endorsement of the other, leading to backlash from multiple directions simultaneously.
The path to building a resilient brand is not through silence, but through a clear articulation of corporate values, coupled with tangible, demonstrable commitment to the local market. The top trust-building actions for global brands, according to consumers, are creating quality local jobs, working with local suppliers, and adapting to the local culture.
This leads to a powerful conclusion about the strategic function of localization. Deep integration into the local economy is not just a sound business practice for market entry; it is a brand’s most potent reputational shield against geopolitical turmoil. When a global brand is targeted by international boycotts, the attack is aimed at the multinational corporate entity.
The most effective defense, however, is invariably local. When Unilever’s CEO Alan Jope was challenged over the decision by its subsidiary Ben & Jerry’s to boycott certain territories, his response was not a lecture on corporate structure. He immediately pivoted to Unilever’s deep and tangible investments in Israel: four factories, 2,000 employees, a new EUR 35 million razor factory, and active engagement with the local start-up community. Similarly, McDonald’s Israel actively promotes the fact that it sources over 80% of its ingredients locally.
This is the strategy I advocate for all my clients. A robust, well-publicized local supply chain, significant local employment, and visible, meaningful community engagement programs create a powerful counter-narrative.
The PR message evolves from “We are a foreign brand in Israel” to “We are an integral part of the Israeli economic and social fabric.” This transforms the company from a simple, abstract foreign target into a complex, tangible local entity that employs Israelis, supports Israeli suppliers, and contributes to the Israeli community. This deep-rooted local identity does not make the brand immune to criticism, but it builds a vital reservoir of local goodwill and makes it a much more difficult and nuanced target for politically motivated attacks.
Lessons from the Field: Case Studies in the Israeli Market
Theoretical frameworks and strategic principles are essential, but their true value is revealed only when tested in the unforgiving reality of the marketplace. To provide the most actionable guidance, my analysis now turns to concrete case studies from the Israeli market. The stark contrast between high-profile failures and celebrated successes offers the most powerful and memorable lessons for any global business leader. By deconstructing these examples, we can move from abstract concepts to a tangible understanding of what it takes to win—or lose—in this unique environment.
The Anatomy of Failure: Why Starbucks Couldn’t Brew Success in Israel
The withdrawal of Starbucks from Israel in 2003 after just two years of operation is a seminal case study in international business schools, and for good reason. My post-mortem of this failure reveals that it was not a simple matter of mismatched taste preferences, as is often superficially reported. It was a comprehensive failure of strategic public relations, cultural intelligence, and executive judgment.
-
Lack of Peripheral Vision:
The core mistake was a failure to accurately read the existing market map. Starbucks management entered Israel with a “lack of peripheral vision,” assuming that its global brand power would be sufficient for success. They fundamentally misunderstood and underestimated the sophisticated, European-style café culture that was already deeply entrenched. By 2001, Israel already had approximately 750 local coffee shops, where customers demanded high-quality coffee and valued the café as a social space for lingering and conversation, not just a transaction point for takeaway beverages.
-
Strategic Partner Mismatch:
The choice of a local partner is one of the most critical decisions in any market entry. Starbucks’ joint venture with Delek Israel Fuel Company (DIFC), an operator of gas stations and convenience stores, was a profound strategic and cultural mismatch. While successful in its own sphere, Delek lacked the essential expertise in food service, hospitality, and the nuances of creating an appealing café environment. This partnership failed to create the synergy needed to compete with established local players.
-
Product and Experience Mismatch:
The company attempted to force-fit its standardized American model onto a market with different tastes and habits. The coffee was perceived by many Israeli customers as being of inferior quality compared to the stronger, richer blends already available from local and other international chains like Arcaffe. Furthermore, the emphasis on a quick, takeaway-oriented experience clashed with the local preference for a leisurely, social “sit-down” café culture.
-
Emotion Over Analysis:
Perhaps the most critical lesson comes from the leadership level. Evidence suggests the market entry was driven more by the emotional commitment of then-CEO Howard Schultz than by rigorous, objective market analysis. This led to a dangerous combination of overconfidence and escalating commitment. Because Starbucks had been successful in other global markets, including in the Arab Middle East, the leadership team exhibited an unshakeable belief that the venture would necessarily succeed, blinding them to the clear warning signs that the strategy was failing.
In the end, Starbucks failed not because Israelis don’t like coffee, but because the company failed to respect the market. It did not listen, it did not adapt, and it did not build a proposition that offered superior value to what already existed. It was a failure of public relations in its truest sense: a failure to build a relationship of mutual understanding with its public.
The Art of Adaptation: How McDonald’s and IKEA Won Israeli Hearts
In stark contrast to the Starbucks debacle, my analysis of McDonald’s and IKEA reveals how a strategy of deep, thoughtful localization can lead to profound and lasting success. These brands did not simply translate their marketing materials; they fundamentally re-engineered their offerings and their community engagement to resonate with the specific cultural and social fabric of Israel.
McDonald’s: Becoming a Local Institution
McDonald’s, a brand that has failed in other markets by being too rigid, succeeded in Israel by demonstrating remarkable flexibility. Its multi-faceted localization strategy is a masterclass in cultural adaptation:
-
Deep Product Localization:
The company went far beyond simply putting up a Hebrew menu. It made the strategic decision to operate both kosher and non-kosher branches to cater to the full spectrum of Israeli society. It introduced locally resonant menu items like the McFalafel and the McKebab. Most remarkably, it received special permission from its global headquarters to change its core cooking method to charcoal grilling, a fundamental alteration designed to appeal directly to local taste preferences.
-
Visible Community Integration:
As I have argued, local investment is a reputational shield. McDonald’s Israel has made this a core part of its brand identity, publicly stating that it sources over 80% of its ingredients from local Israeli suppliers. It also engages in highly visible local charitable efforts, such as supporting children’s hospitals.
This strategy has allowed McDonald’s Israel to build a powerful identity as a “local” brand, which has provided a degree of insulation and local support even as the global corporation faces international boycotts.
IKEA: Purpose-Driven Innovation and Niche Segmentation
IKEA’s success in Israel is a testament to a different but equally powerful form of localization, one based on social attunement and a deep understanding of the diverse communities within the country.
-
The “ThisAbles” Campaign:
This globally acclaimed PR initiative was born in Israel. In partnership with local NGOs Access Israel and Milbat, IKEA Israel co-created a series of 13 clever add-ons that could be 3D-printed to make its most popular furniture accessible for people with disabilities.
This was a masterstroke of purpose-driven public relations. It was not a top-down corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaign; it was a genuine, collaborative effort to solve a real problem for a segment of the community.
The campaign generated enormous positive earned media, reinforced IKEA’s core mission of “creating a better everyday for the many people,” and delivered tangible business results, with revenue for the products featured growing by 33%.
-
Hyper-Targeted Cultural Segmentation:
In a move that demonstrated an unparalleled level of market understanding, the local IKEA franchisee produced a special version of its catalog specifically for Israel’s ultra-Orthodox Jewish community. This catalog featured only men and boys, in adherence with the community’s strict modesty customs. While such a move would be highly controversial in many Western markets, in the Israeli context, it was a clear signal that IKEA understood and respected the unique cultural norms of a significant domestic consumer segment.
Strategic Localization: A Comparative Analysis of Market Entry in Israel
To distill the lessons from these cases into a clear, executive-level summary, I have developed the following comparative table. It visually demonstrates the direct correlation between a PR-led strategy of deep localization and ultimate business outcomes in the Israeli market.
| Strategic Pillar | Starbucks (Failure) | McDonald’s (Success) | IKEA (Success) |
| Product Adaptation | Minimal; exported a standardized US model and experience. | Extensive; offered Kosher/non-Kosher options, local menu items (McFalafel), and adapted cooking methods. | Niche & Purpose-driven; created “ThisAbles” accessibility add-ons and culturally segmented catalogs for specific communities. |
| Partner Selection | Strategic Mismatch; partnered with a fuel company lacking relevant expertise. | Strong Local Operator; partnered with an Israeli businessman (Omri Padan) with deep market knowledge. | Empowered Local Franchisee; allowed the local partner the autonomy to make culturally specific decisions. |
| Community Engagement | Limited to none reported in the available analysis. | High; emphasized 80%+ local sourcing and supported local charities, building a “local” identity. | High & Collaborative; co-created solutions with local NGOs and held hackathons involving the disabled community. |
| PR Narrative | “A global coffee leader arrives.” (Implied superiority). | “McDonald’s, but for Israelis.” (Emphasized adaptation and familiarity). | “Creating a better everyday life for all Israelis.” (Stressed inclusivity and innovation). |
| Business Outcome | Complete market exit within two years. | Market leader with a dominant 60% share. | Strong sales growth and global brand acclaim. |
A Blueprint for Success: Strategic PR Recommendations for Global Companies
Drawing together every thread of my analysis—from the strategic function of international PR and the paradoxical nature of the Israeli market to the psychology of its consumers and the potent lessons from past failures and successes—I will now synthesize this intelligence into a clear, actionable blueprint.
These are the strategic recommendations I provide to C-suite executives of global companies who are serious about achieving sustainable success in Israel.
This is not a tactical checklist but a strategic mindset, grounded in the principle that in this market, relationships are the bedrock of reputation, and trust is the ultimate currency.
The “Listen First” Mandate: Pre-entry Research and Cultural Immersion
My primary recommendation is to reject the notion that you can understand a market as complex as Israel from a boardroom in New York, London, or Shanghai. You must not outsource your understanding.
-
Recommendation:
Invest heavily in qualitative, immersive research that goes far beyond standard quantitative data and focus groups. The goal is to achieve genuine cultural immersion.
This involves sophisticated social listening to understand the nuances of online conversations and, most critically, engaging local public relations experts and consultants from the very beginning of the exploratory process.
These local professionals should not be treated as mere vendors to be hired after the strategy is set; they must be integrated into the core decision-making team as your essential cultural translators and strategic advisors.
-
Actionable Steps:
Before committing significant resources, I advise conducting a “Cultural Due Diligence” audit. This process involves systematically mapping your brand’s core values, communication style, and business practices against Israeli cultural norms (e.g., dugri directness, informality, relationship-centricity, the importance of the Sabbath).
The objective is to proactively identify potential points of friction and cultural dissonance. This allows the brand to adapt its approach before making a costly mistake, rather than attempting to apologize for one after the fact.
Crafting the Israeli Narrative: The Principles of Authentic Storytelling
Once a deep understanding of the market has been achieved, the next step is to craft a compelling and authentic narrative. A generic global brand story will not suffice.
-
Recommendation:
Your narrative must be built on the principles of authenticity, transparency, and demonstrable value to the Israeli public. I counsel my clients to abandon corporate jargon and messaging that emphasizes global legacy or market dominance. The story should not be about who the brand has been elsewhere, but about who it will be in Israel. It must answer the implicit question from the Israeli consumer: “What is your contribution?”
-
Actionable Steps:
Develop a core messaging framework that is rooted in local commitment.
This narrative should be supported by tangible proof points. Highlight investments in the local economy, the creation of high-quality local jobs, and strategic partnerships with Israeli start-ups, academic institutions, or community organizations.
The most effective positioning is to frame the brand not as a foreign entity extracting value, but as a committed partner in Israel’s ongoing journey of innovation and growth.
Building a Resilient Reputation: Proactive Engagement and Crisis Readiness
In a market as dynamic and politically charged as Israel, reputation cannot be managed reactively. It must be proactively built and rigorously defended. The goal is to build a deep reservoir of trust and goodwill before a crisis hits.
-
Recommendation:
A brand’s reputation is its most valuable asset and must be treated as such. This requires a long-term, sustained commitment to building genuine relationships and demonstrating positive corporate citizenship.
- Actionable Steps:
-
Systematic Stakeholder Mapping and Engagement:
Go beyond transactional media relations. Identify and build genuine, long-term relationships with the key individuals and institutions that shape opinion in your sector.
This includes influential journalists, industry analysts, digital influencers, relevant government officials, and community leaders. These relationships are your early warning system and your most credible advocates in a time of crisis.
-
Meaningful Community Investment:
Avoid “checkbook charity.” Instead, develop a signature social responsibility program that is authentic to your brand’s values and addresses a genuine, specific need within Israeli society.
The IKEA “ThisAbles” campaign is the gold standard. By co-creating a solution to a real problem, IKEA generated a powerful, authentic story that built immense goodwill and differentiated the brand in a profound way. Such an initiative is far more valuable than any advertising campaign.
-
Develop a Geopolitical Crisis Plan:
This is, in my professional judgment, absolutely non-negotiable for any global brand operating in Israel. This plan must be a sophisticated, scenario-based document that anticipates the specific reputational risks associated with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and other regional tensions.
It must outline a clear communications protocol, designate pre-approved local and global spokespeople, and contain holding statements and core messages that are aligned with the company’s global values while acknowledging the extreme sensitivity and complexity of the situation.
The primary objective of this plan is to protect the safety and well-being of local employees while defending the global brand from the inevitable political pressures and potential for international boycotts. Failure to prepare for this eventuality is not just a strategic oversight; it is an abdication of executive responsibility.